Talking Family Law – the Resolution Podcast

Listen to Resolution’s podcast, with guest experts discussing topical issues in Family Law, with our hosts Simon Blain and Anita Mehta.

Join Resolution’s family law experts in our Podcast series

Each episode welcomes guest experts sharing their take on topical family law issues.  We cover the whole spectrum of family law, from abduction, surrogacy, and public law to financial remedy.

We invite our guests to take a deep-dive into a different topic each month.  On each episode we try and cover what is the current state of the law, or the leading authority, practical tips (if you are running one of these cases), and thoughts for reform.

Do expect some lively debates, and personal insights.  We try to find known experts in their field and ask them the things that we all want to know.  If you are an expert on a particular topic, either regionally or nationally, we would like to hear from you, so do please get in touch.

We were thrilled to be shortlisted for the Family Law Commentator of the Year award at the 2023 LexisNexis Awards.

Hosts Simon Blain and Anita Mehta with Resolution staff at the LexisNexis Awards 2023

Listen on the go:

 

DISCLAIMER:  Nothing in any of the episodes is supposed to constitute legal advice.  We invite our guests to express personal views by way of legal commentary, this may differ from how they put their client’s case.

No liability is accepted for any error or omission about the law in respect of a particular topic.

 

S3 Episode 9: Maintenance and the Length of the Judge’s Foot

About this episode

Hosted by: Anita Mehta and Simon Blain

Guests: Sally Harrison KC and Farhana Shahzady

Further information

What is the correct approach to a maintenance case? Listen to Sally Harrison KC (St John’s Buildings) and Farhana Shahzady (Streathers Solicitors) tell us how it is done.

Sally reminds us of the guidance of Mr Justice Peel in WC v HC (Financial Remedies Agreements) (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 22 (22 March 2022)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/22.html

When thinking about the quantum of a maintenance order, Mr Justice Peel found that needs are an elastic concept, to be judged by reference to consideration of financial needs and obligations, whether there are children, and the age of the parties.  We discuss how the length of the marriage really impacts on how much the standard of living is taken into account.  Farhana reminds of guidance of Mr Justice Mostyn in SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) (Rev 1) [2014] EWHC 4183 (Fam).

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/4183.html

Sally and Farhana discuss the distinction between cases involving wealthy families where the Court may well be inclined to make a Duxbury award, as opposed to need based income awards in the majority of cases.  We discuss the overall impression that Courts are being quite restrictive on terms and quantum of maintenance at present.

When talking about capitalising maintenance awards, Sally wrestles with the discrepancy between the Ogden tables having a -0.25% rate of return in England & Wales, as opposed to Duxbury’s 3.75% rate of return after inflation of 3%.

Sally considers the following cases:

HC v FW [2017] EWHC 3162 (Fam) (29 November 2017)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2017/3162.html

Tattersall

Z (No.5) (Enforcement) [2024] EWFC 44 (04 March 2024)

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2024/44.html

Farhana tells us why it is important to consider the impact of menopause, when considering maintenance quantum, term and nominal maintenance.  She shares the details of her survey about the impact of maintenance in family law and financial remedy cases.

Resolution will be releasing a spousal maintenance handbook in Summer 2024. Please check the website for details.

  • Let us know your ideas

  • Let us know issues we should cover, people we could invite on or other ideas you have for the Resolution podcast:

  • If you'd like us to contact you, please leave your contact information below: