Coercive control and financial remedies: the decision in Traharne v Limb

by Kathryn Cassells

Is there a risk that the concept of coercive and controlling behaviour could have unintended consequences in financial remedy cases, introducing blame just as no-fault looked to have left it behind?

The full version of this page is only viewable by logged in Resolution members, please login to carry on reading...

Not a member? Join Resolution and recieve our great membership benefits